Here's a collection of theories that I have been meaning to write, some for years. They are all too short to write full on essays about so here they are in brief.
People believe they deserve
control, love, and a purpose, but not a single one of these things is
guaranteed.
The Emotion/Logic Spectrum:
Everyone falls somewhere on a
spectrum with emotion on one end and logic on the other. There are benefits to
spending time with people who linger close to your side of the spectrum in
terms of relatability, but spending time with people on the opposite of the
spectrum is good for perspective. When making a decision, it is best to consult
people on both sides of the spectrum if you are in the middle or people on the
opposite side from you if you lean more towards one side.
If you live too close to the
edge of either spectrum, it can be really hard for you to understand the
motivations of people who live on the other side. For instance, someone who
lives at 95% logic might not understand emotional responses to behavior that
they believe can be surmounted with logic. Often the very logical view the
emotional as weak or annoying and the very emotional view the logical as
heartless and boring. If you do live too far on one side, it will be a lot
harder for you to interact with people on the other side, but it is vitally
important that you do so in order to get along with people.
Also important is that some people
aren’t good at determining where they are on the spectrum. Plenty of people who
claim to be solely logic-driven are actually heavily, if not primarily, driven
by emotion. This flaw has a tendency to fall along gender lines as men are socialized
to not be emotional, although they are actually socialized to show only
emotions like anger. Therefore, men who do show socially acceptable male
emotions view themselves as completely logic driven even though they are not.
People of all genders who acknowledge a tendency towards emotion are usually
more accurate in their assessment, but many are more than capable of
logic-based responses. It just takes some effort and cultivation that people
usually don’t wish to put in to develop logical responses.
Resilience:
The most resilient people are
always the ones who have had to face the most in terms of tragedies. Early
exposure to tragedy is often the most beneficial as children are more malleable
and resilient and can then carry that resilience into adulthood. A person who
is happy, or at least contented, either has suffered tremendously and managed
to work through it or hasn’t suffered at all. When someone who hasn’t suffered
is then faced with tragedy later in life they will have one of two responses.
Either they will have built up enough good faith from a life of ease that they
will be able to deal with the tragedy with positivity, or they will become
completely disillusioned and fall apart. The latter is usually the more common.
It is also worth noting that
early exposure to tragedy, while beneficial for many, can also fully break
someone before they have had a chance to thrive. This is why the type of
tragedy and the after effects can be very important. Facing the death of a
loved one is usually the kind of positive tragedy that builds resilience as it
teaches children that good things don’t always last and that you have to value
people in your life. If that loved one was a primary caregiver, however, this
can lead to negative after effects as a result of the death. Something like a
sexual assault is the kind of negative tragedy that can have negative effects
on future relationships. A lesson may be learned, but it is a lesson that
should not be taught to a child and it should never be taught in that way.
Money & Happiness:
The idea that money can’t buy
happiness is wrong. Money can buy happiness. The fallacy is in thinking you’ll
know how to use it. Money can buy you a lot of material possessions, which is
how most people would use a surplus of money if acquired, but material
possessions are not something that can bring anyone lasting happiness. What
brings people lasting happiness is connection with others and the meeting of
basic needs, things that money can make easier to accomplish.
What money can buy are
healthcare for you and the people you love so they you can better enjoy life.
It can buy quality time spent with people you love. It can buy shelter and food
so you never have to worry about how to acquire those things. It can buy
supplies needed to fulfill hobbies that bring you joy. It can buy experiences
that you could not have without the time or money to have them.
Money can buy happiness, but
wealth cannot.
Rumors:
If
you find out that there is a rumor going around about you that is true, you
have no reason to be upset about the rumor unless you are ashamed of that
truth. If you live your life without shame, these rumors will never affect you.
If
you find out that there is a rumor going around about you that is untrue, you
have no reason to be upset about the rumor as it is false. A false rumor can
usually be proven false. The only situation you have to fear is a false rumor
that cannot be proven false.
Tom’s
People:
·
Engineers: Those who create and control and construct.
·
Data Analysts: Those who investigate and study and display
information found.
·
Philosophers: Those who question and think and discuss.
·
Storytellers: Those who experience and engage and entertain.
There
is overlap in these types.
A
storyteller is an engineer in the way they take experiences and construct them
into a story. A philosopher might engineer a theory. A data analyst may
engineer a display of their findings.
When
a data analyst meditates on people, they are looking at quantifiable
information they may express in words or numbers. When a philosopher meditates
on people they do so qualitatively but in the abstract. When a storyteller
meditates on people, they do so qualitatively but in the concrete.
Engineers
have a philosophy of construction. Data analysts have a philosophy they wish to
prove. Storytellers impart their life philosophy with every story they tell.
No comments:
Post a Comment